Logo
UpTrust
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQLog InSign Up
Log InSign Up
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQ
UpTrustUpTrust

Social media built on trust and credibility. Where thoughtful contributions rise to the top.

Get Started

Sign UpLog In

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCA
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.

general discussion

  • UpTrust Admin avatar

    What is the 'Metacrisis' and How Do We Solve It? (AMA). Rewatch the live AMA conversation with Layman Pascal 

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyq_ZfdtTmg
    jordanSA•...

    love this question, will bring it in next!

    general discussion
    Comments
    0
  • vaibhavSA•...

    test post

    test post

    general discussion
    Comments
    0
  • G

     "For Lacan, ‘full speech’ took place on the level of the Symbolic; here was where meaning was produced and expressed. By contrast, ‘empty speech’ occurred at the level of the Imaginary, a pure signification devoid of true meaning... ‘Full speech is speech which aims at, which forms, the truth such as it becomes established in the recognition of one person by another. Full speech is speech which performs"

    This is a different cut on the question of earnestness and sincerity, and I find it quite powerful.

    Hannah Aline Taylor•...

    Love this take, Jordan. Thank you. 

    literary criticism
    general discussion
    Comments
    0
  • M

    A Plausible Oncoming Financial Storm. So, the economic situation might end up pretty dire if the following is correct. I'm posting this line-of-thought in case someone wants to sanity check it.

    "To boost the British economy, I'd tax all foreigners living abroad."
    -- Monty Python's Flying Circus

    My read on the current economic order is that America is an empire. Now empires are supposed to extract tribute, and America might at first glance not appear to do that. But I claim it does. Instead of direct taxation the mechanism seems to be:

    * Use a combination of diplomatic carrots and military sticks to make the dollar the world's reserve currency.
    * Inflate the dollar by "borrowing" from the federal reserve (read: printing more dollars but with extra steps).
    * Spend the printed money to subsidize American citizens in a bunch of ways to haphazardly offset the effect of the inflation being a pretty regressive taxation regime by default (medicaid, social security, food stamps, government jobs, etc.)

    Now my fear is, if the Trump administration messes up our foreign policy badly enough (e.g. by unnecessarily hitting allies with the tariff stick, and showing signs that they will not in fact defend countries like Ukraine that the US had agreements with) the dollar might lose its reserve currency status. If this happens, we might be in for some pretty nasty levels of inflation (because, what happens if all those foreigners and corporations start dumping their dollar reserves?)

    Anyway, I'm curious what people think of this line of reasoning.

    #deeptakesonhottakes

    blasomenessphemy•...

    I think this makes a ton of sense.

    general discussion
    Comments
    0
  • Philip avatar

    So.. who’s winning in y’all’s opinion?

    brianSA•...

    I haven’t kept score. They both seem fine?

    sports
    general discussion
    games
    Comments
    0
  • xander avatar

    Yay, mic cut. glad to see that’s here, but sad it is needed

    jordanSA•...

    ha i just mentioned this. I agree.

    general discussion
    Comments
    0
  • xander avatar

    Is the republican representation of amber healthy amber. I’ve heard it said in these parts that the green of the democratic party is unhealthy. I’m curious about that, but more so, with all the recent changes in the republican party as influenced by Donald Trump, representing a major shift away from previous republican values, are they still healthy?

    xander•...

    Agreed in that in seems to be a big mess.

    literature
    communication
    general discussion
    Comments
    0
Loading related tags...